Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40451939›Full record

ReviewFamilial cancer2025

Redefining familial adenomatous polyposis: competition, cooperation, and the path to monoclonality.

Sylvain Ferrandon, Matthew F Kalady, Sanne M van Neerven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sylvain FerrandonDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, US.
Matthew F KaladyDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, US.
Sanne M van NeervenThe Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK. sv490@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-5756

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCBTP-Nov23/100015ZonMw (Rubicon 452021320)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by germline mutations in the APC gene that result in the development of hundreds of premalignant adenomas throughout the colon and rectum. Prophylactic surgery remains the primary intervention strategy, as there are currently no pharmacological treatment options for FAP patients. Previous therapeutic approaches have predominantly focused on reducing polyp size rather than preventing their initiation, thereby missing a key opportunity for early intervention. Crucially, to effectively target the earliest stages of tumour development requires a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying adenoma formation. In this review, we evaluate the latest models and methods employed to investigate the origin of FAP adenomas. We describe how mutant cells expand from their initial emergence within the intestinal epithelium and how they compete with normal cells within intestinal crypts. In addition, we discuss how multiple mutant crypts cooperate to collectively form polyclonal adenomas, and how these polyclonal lesions gradually transition towards monoclonality as adenomas progress towards colorectal cancer. Finally, we highlight how these insights inform the development of targeted cancer prevention strategies for individuals with FAP.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAdenomaAnimalsGenes, APCGerm-Line MutationHumansIntestinal MucosaCancer preventionFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)Intestinal adenomasPolyclonalityTumour initiation

Identifiers

PMID40451939
PMCPMC12127228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.