ArticleScientific reports2025
Constructing a predictive model of negative academic emotions in high school students based on machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of emotional well-being in university professors using Machine Learning.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative academic emotions reflect the negative experiences that learners encounter during the learning process. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in predicting high school students' negative academic emotions and analyze the factors influencing these emotions, providing valuable insights for promoting the psychological health of high school students. Based on the microsystem proposed in ecological systems theory, we comprehensively consider individual and school factors that affect students' negative academic emotions. We randomly selected 1,710 high school students from Hebei Province, China (742 males), who completed the Adolescent Resilience Scale, Multidimensional Multi-Attributional Causality Style Scale, Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Teacher Discipline Style Scale, and Academic Emotion Scale. We applied various machine learning models, such as logistic regression, naive Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, and adaptive boosting, to analyze the students' negative academic emotions. The results show that the random forest model had the best predictive performance, with an accuracy of 83.9%. Subsequently, the importance of variables was determined using the forward feature selection method. We concluded that the most important factors for predicting high school students' negative academic emotions are affect control, followed by ability attribution, luck attribution, background attribution, self-efficacy for learning behaviors, and self-efficacy for learning abilities. This study validates the applicability and value of machine learning models in predicting negative academic emotions, providing important insights for educational practice. When designing intervention strategies, attention should be given to the development of emotional control and attribution styles to help students better alleviate excessive negative academic emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.