ArticleScientific reports2025
Long-term pituitary function following transsphenoidal surgery for non-functional pituitary neuroendocrine tumor with apoplexy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study aims to investigate pituitary function 3 years after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with non-functional pituitary neuroendocrine tumor(NF-PitNET) complicated by apoplexy. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with NF-PitNET who underwent transsphenoidal surgery from January 2016 to September 2020. The patients were divided into apoplexy group and non-apoplexy group based on magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), surgical, and pathological findings. A comparative analysis of pituitary endocrine function was conducted between the two groups at three years postoperatively. A total of 563 patients were initially screened, and 50 matched pairs were included in the study following propensity score matching.Preoperatively, 35 patients in the apoplexy group exhibited pituitary hormone deficiencies, including 2 cases of panhypopituitarism and 14 cases with deficiencies in two or more hormones.In contrast, the non-apoplexy group had 30 patients with pituitary hormone deficiencies, of which 8 had deficiencies in two or more hormones, with no cases of panhypopituitarism.A significant difference was observed in the incidence of ACTH axis deficiency between the two groups (36% vs. 14%, p = 0.011). This trend persisted at the 3-year follow-up, where the apoplexy group continued to show a significantly higher prevalence of ACTH deficiency (34% vs. 16%, p = 0.038).No significant difference was found in the incidence of preoperative LH/FSH axis insufficiency between the groups (38% vs. 40%, p = 0.838).However, at the 3-year follow-up, the apoplexy group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of LH/FSH axis insufficiency compared to the non-apoplexy group (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.027). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of deficiencies in two or more hormones between the two groups after 3 years of follow-up (39.1% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.705). Pituitary apoplexy is commonly associated with pituitary insufficiency. Patients with preoperative apoplexy are more susceptible to ACTH axis dysfunction compared to those without apoplexy, and they demonstrate significantly poorer recovery of ACTH axis function following transsphenoidal surgery. Additionally, among patients with apoplexy, the postoperative recovery of LH/FSH axis function is also notably inferior to that observed in non-apoplexy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.