Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40451536›Full record

ArticleIndian heart journal

India cardiology training curriculum- a critical reappraisal: Is it the time to rethink?

Aditya Kapoor, Rishi Sethi, Rakesh Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aditya KapoorDept of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, India. Electronic address: akapoor65@gmail.com.
Rishi SethiDept of CardiologyKGMULucknow, India.
Rakesh YadavDept of Cardiology, AIIMS, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges and rigors of the modern-day health care systems demand a critical reappraisal of our training paradigms in cardiology. Today, modern day DM and DNB Cardiology training needs to seamlessly amalgamate traditional teaching methodologies with the rapidly evolving technology based educational tools now available to us for personalized and adaptive learning. The contemporary cardiology curricula need to incorporate ALL components of clinical competency including cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills to enable the next generation of cardiologists to provide truly holistic care to their patients. In addition, a greater focus on impactful cardiology research with an intent to publish it while in training, is likely to encourage at least some of the young trainees to pursue careers in academia. Most importantly, the exit examination patterns need to be restructured. We need to decide whether we need cardiologists who simply follow textbooks and are trained in procedures -or we need those who have the ability to themselves write the next chapters in cardiology, have the precision of thought, the depth of empathy, and the courage to question.

Indexed as

CardiologyClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyHumansIndiaCurriculumDM cardiologyReappraisalTraining

Identifiers

PMID40451536
PMCPMC12327526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.