Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40451244›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2025

The Prevalence and Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections in South Africa: A Literature Review.

Emmy Ngoakoana Nokaneng, Samantha L Holloway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emmy Ngoakoana NokanengMaxillo-Facial and Oral Surgeon, University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital Complex, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-2439
Samantha L HollowaySchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3307-8248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infection is a post-operative complication, which has a significant clinical impact on the affected individual as well as the healthcare system. They are associated with poor outcomes such as increased length of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality and readmissions. As a result, surgical site infections are used as an indicator of the quality of surgical care and for benchmarking. The aim of the review is to gain insight on the current prevalence/incidence and surveillance of surgical site infection in South Africa. The objective was to determine the surgical site infection rate associated with Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery procedures. A literature review was conducted with the search strategy limited to articles published in English with no limitation to the period. Fifteen articles were deemed eligible for the review according to the inclusion criteria. Eleven articles focused on the epidemiology of surgical site infection in South Africa. The surgical site infection rate varies from 0.65-48% with heterogeneity in the characteristics of the surveillance programmes. The review showed variability in the SSI rates with similar variability in the incidence of surgical site infection as reported on sub-Saharan and African countries (7.93, 9.3, 19.1, 14.5% respectively). The above information was gleaned from institutional point/period prevalence or incidences due to a lack of an integrated national surveillance programme. Thus, there is an urgent necessity to establish an integrated national surveillance programme to facilitate monitoring as well as prevention of surgical site infection in South Africa.

Indexed as

Surgical Wound InfectionAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceSouth Africaclinical indicatororal and maxillofacial surgeryprevalence/incidencesurgical site infectionsurveillance programme

Identifiers

PMID40451244
PMCPMC12127039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.