Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40451187›Full record

SynthesisJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2025

Research Review: Conceptualizing and measuring 'problem behavior' in early intervention autism research - a project AIM secondary systematic review.

Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Ruoxi Guo, Jessica Hinson-Wiliams, Yueyang Shen, Shannon LaPoint, Tiffany Woynaroski, Micheal Sandbank

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristen Bottema-BeutelLynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-9464
Ruoxi GuoLynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica Hinson-WiliamsLynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.
Yueyang ShenLynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.
Shannon LaPointSchool of Teacher Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Tiffany WoynaroskiDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Micheal SandbankDivision of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Sensory Project in Infant/Toddler Siblings of Children with Autism (Project SPIS)R01DC020186 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Tiffany Woynaroski · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Argyelan Family Research FundNIDCD NIH HHS 1R01DC020186NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome autistic children exhibit behavior that caregivers, clinicians, and researchers consider problematic. However, there is little consensus about the types of behaviors that should be treated as a problem and reduced via intervention. In autism intervention research, problem behaviors range from inherently harmful behaviors such as aggression and self-injury to nonnormative but not harmful behaviors associated with autism such as repetitive movements. Likewise, there are a variety of conceptualizations and measurement practices used to assess these behaviors.

methodsIn this secondary systematic review of group-design, nonpharmacological intervention studies for autistic children up to age eight, we explore researchers' conceptualizations of problem behavior and measurement systems to assess problem behavior. We defined problem behavior as any outcome where behaviors were targeted for reduction or elimination. A coding scheme was applied to 102 studies that met inclusion criteria for the secondary review. All studies were double coded by two independent coders.

resultsSixty-two percent of studies described reducing behavior as a primary or secondary purpose of the study and/or intervention, 33% gave a rationale for targeting behaviors for reduction, and 28% offered a conceptualization of the behavior(s) they targeted. Only 8% offered a conceptual definition. The most common measures were 'off-the-shelf' measures that had undergone at least some previous validation beyond interrater reliability and that involved parent reports. For the 10 most common assessment measures, two were validated along six different validation dimensions in autistic populations. All but one full scale or subscale measured behaviors that were nonnormative but not inherently harmful, or a mix of behaviors that were inherently harmful and that were nonnormative but not inherently harmful.

conclusionsIntervention researchers should provide clear definitions and rationales for targeting behaviors for reduction via intervention and should develop refined measurement tools for assessing these behaviors in collaboration with the autistic community.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderEarly Intervention, EducationalProblem BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolHumansautismearly interventionmeasurementProblem behaviorrestrictive and repetitive behaviortreatment

Identifiers

PMID40451187
PMCPMC12354140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.