ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Postoperative feedback-oriented health education in ambulatory robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a single-center nursing intervention cohort study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in ambulatory mode: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of integrated continuity of care in ambulatory robotic partial nephrectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the application effect of feedback health education in the care of patients after robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in ambulatory mode. 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the ambulatory surgery department of our hospital from June 2022 to June 2024 were randomly selected as the study subjects and were divided into the observation group (n = 50 cases) and the control group (n = 50 cases). The observation group used feedback health education, the control group used conventional health education, and the two groups were compared with regard to the patients' psychological status, medication adherence, life quality assessment, and patient satisfaction score. After the intervention, the SAD score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (42.14 ± 3.52 vs. 47.16 ± 4.60, P < 0.001). SAS scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (43.9 ± 5.06 vs. 48.36 ± 3.89, P < 0.001). Adherence scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (7.16 ± 0.71 vs. 6.56 ± 1.15, P = 0.002), and medication adherence was better in the observation group than in the control group (P = 0.008). ADL scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.4 ± 5.09 vs. 80.62 ± 5.70, P < 0.001). Nursing satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.42 ± 4.79 vs. 81.12 ± 4.88, P < 0.001). Compared with traditional nursing education, the feedback health education method helps improve the psychological state of patients undergoing robotic-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the day mode, and improves medication adherence, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40450624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.