SynthesisOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Impact of maxillofacial fractures on patients' quality-of-life measures: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of psychosocial reintegration following prosthetic rehabilitation using Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale: A case series.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of maxillofacial fractures (MFFs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review was carried out following the MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. The search was conducted in LILACS, Embase, and PubMed databases alongside manual reference checks, with no date restrictions, including observational studies that assessed HRQoL or OHRQoL in patients with MFFs using validated instruments. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI checklist.
resultsTwelve studies were included in the analysis, most with a cohort design and male predominance. The results indicated a negative impact of MFFs on HRQoL, especially in the immediate post-traumatic period/immediately after MFF diagnosis, with impairment in domains such as pain, physical function, mental health, and social aspects. OHRQoL was also affected, mainly regarding pain, chewing difficulty, and dietary changes. Although most studies indicated improved quality of life after treatment and recovery, long-term sequelae, such as infraorbital nerve paresthesia, may persist. The review showed heterogeneity among studies regarding geographical origin, methodological design, follow-up periods, and quality of life assessment instruments. Small sample sizes, lack of detailed analysis of socioeconomic and health factors, inadequate control of variables, and the predominance of male patients in some studies limit the generalizability of the findings.
conclusionMFFs seem to affect patients' HRQoL and OHRQoL, but further longitudinal studies with larger samples and standardized assessments are needed to deepen the understanding of the long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40450622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.