ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Motor Impairment in Children with 16p11.2-Deletion and -Duplication Syndromes.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study sought to explore the motor phenotype of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes in a sample of probands (50.5% female), ranging in age from 6 months to 17 years. The extent and variability of motor dysfunction was assessed among carriers of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes, non-carrier siblings, and non-familial controls using several standardized performance- and informant-based measures. Analyses indicated that probands with either 16p11.2 deletion or duplication syndrome exhibited poorer motor performance compared to familial and non-familial controls. While deletion and duplication carriers performed similarly across several measures of fine-motor functioning, deletion carriers scored significantly lower than duplication carriers on the MABC-2, a comprehensive assessment of both gross- and fine-motor skills. Males and females with a 16p11.2 CNV performed worse on motor tasks compared to non-carrier controls, but there were no sex differences within carrier groups. Results underscore motor impairment as a clear feature of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes in infancy through adolescence. Motor functioning is discussed as a facet with strong evidence to support early identification practices of ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40450614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.