Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450606›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025

Urinary Dysfunction Is Common in Patients with Fecal Urgency and May Relate to Altered Rectal Biomechanics.

Matthew Woo, Krystyna Pokraka, Milli Gupta, Dorothy Li, Michelle Buresi, Yasmin Nasser, Christopher N Andrews

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew WooDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada. matt.woo1@ucalgary.ca.
Krystyna PokrakaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Milli GuptaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Dorothy LiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Michelle BuresiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Yasmin NasserDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Christopher N AndrewsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal urgency is a common symptom in both healthy patients and in those with bowel dysfunction. Fecal urgency is often thought to be associated with diarrhea and incontinence; however, a portion of patients present with constipation.

aimOur aim was to assess for the presence of urinary symptoms in patients with fecal urgency and to elucidate the relationship between colorectal/urinary symptoms and anorectal physiologic parameters.

methodsPatients referred for anorectal function testing between 2019 and 2024 were assessed. Those who underwent anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and rapid barostat bag testing alongside completing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) were included. Anorectal physiologic parameters were compared with colorectal/urinary symptom burden ((as measured by the CRAD-8 and UDI-6 subscale of the PFDI).

resultsFecal urgency was seen in 50.7% of patients. Patients with fecal urgency reported more fecal incontinence (64.4 vs. 15.5%) and urge urinary incontinence (40.3 vs. 21.5%) and had a higher burden of colorectal and urinary symptoms. Their mean resting anal sphincter pressures (68.0 vs. 78.9 mmHg) were lower as were their squeeze (128.9 vs. 162.9 mmHg) and residual pressures (68.6 vs. 82.4 mmHg). Patients with fecal urgency had feeling of urge and sensation at lower balloon volume (131 vs. 153 ml and 81 vs. 107 ml, respectively.

conclusionManometric and biomechanical parameters in patients with fecal urgency, with and without incontinence, are altered. Fecal urgency was associated with higher burden of urinary symptoms, specifically urge incontinence. The correlation between symptoms of fecal and urinary urgency may indicate a shared pathophysiology that requires further study with anorectal physiology and urodynamic testing.

Indexed as

Anal CanalFecal IncontinenceRectumUrinary Incontinence, UrgeAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedAnorectal manometryFecal incontinenceFecal urgencyRapid barostat bagUrge incontinenceUrinary urgency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.