ArticleAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration2025
Differentiating upper- and lower motor neuron diseases using automated acoustic analysis.
Article in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMotor neuron diseases (MNDs) result in a spectrum of motor impairments, including considerable effects on speech function, which manifest as dysarthria-a motor speech disorder. Speech metrics are increasingly recognized as critical biomarkers with potential utility in disease diagnosis and phenotyping. This study aimed to (1) characterize acoustics of upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) dysarthria presentations in MNDs, and (2) identify relationships between bulbar disease severity scores and acoustic features, as these could collectively enable personalized approaches to management of these diseases.
methodsData from 16 individuals with primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) representing UMN disease, 14 individuals with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) representing LMN disease, and 25 neurologically healthy individuals were analyzed. Clinical measures were also collected from PLS and SBMA groups. All participants were remotely recorded performing passage reading, rapid syllable repetition, and vowel phonation. Fifty-two acoustic features were extracted representing articulation, phonation, prosody, resonance, and overall speech timing. Features were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests for between-group comparisons and Spearman correlations between acoustic features and clinical scores.
resultsArticulatory and prosodic features best differentiated PLS, SBMA and controls. Correlations were observed in the PLS group between the clinical score and various articulatory features, most notably those indexing tongue and jaw movements.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that acoustic assessment could capture fingerprints of dysarthrias associated with PLS and SBMA. These findings also demonstrate the potential for remote speech assessment to characterize diverse dysarthria profiles and pave the way for creating ways for personalized disease management approaches in clinical care and trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.