Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450530›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Assessing limits of sustainable seed harvest in wild plant populations.

Anna Bucharova, Oliver Bossdorf, J F Scheepens, Roberto Salguero-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modeling seed germination data to meet biodiversity conservation needs in the Mediterranean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing limits of sustainable seed harvest in wild plant populations.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Plants cultivated for ecosystem restoration can evolve toward a domestication syndrome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna BucharovaDepartment of Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-5426
Oliver BossdorfInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7504-6511
J F ScheepensFaculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1650-2008
Roberto Salguero-GómezDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-4433

Funding

Bridging Funds University of Tübingen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed harvesting from wild plant populations is key for ecological restoration, but it may threaten the persistence of the source populations. Consequently, several countries have set guidelines limiting the proportions of harvestable seeds. However, these guidelines are inconsistent and lack a solid empirical basis. We used matrix population models based on 280 wild plant species, stored in he COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, to model the demographic consequences of seed harvesting. Current guidelines do not protect populations of annuals and short-lived perennials because maximal allowed harvest drew all annual species included in our study to extinction. In contrast, current guidelines are overly restrictive for long-lived plants because these plants could tolerate even higher seed removal than currently allowed. The maximum possible fraction of seed production that can be harvested without compromising the long-term persistence of populations was strongly related to generation time of the target species. When harvesting seeds every year, the fraction of seeds that was safe to harvest (safe seed fraction) ranged from 80% in long-lived species to 2% in most annuals. Less frequent seed harvesting substantially increased the safe seed fraction. In the most vulnerable annual species, it was safe to harvest 5%, 10%, or 30% of a population's seed production when harvesting every 2, 5, or 10 years, respectively. Our results provide a quantitative basis for seed harvesting legislation, based on the generation times of species and harvesting regime.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPlantsSeedsCOMPADRECOMPADRE数据库cosecha de semillasdemografía botánicaecological restorationmatrix population modelsmodelos de matriz poblacionalplant demographyplant populationpoblación de plantasrestauración ecológicaseed harvesting关键词: 种子采收植物种群植物种群统计生态恢复种群矩阵模型

Identifiers

PMID40450530
PMCPMC12451500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.