Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450381›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Physical phantom validation of clustering-initiated factorization in dynamic PET.

Valerie Kobzarenko, Suzanne L Baker, Mustafa Janabi, Woon-Seng Choong, Grant T Gullberg, Youngho Seo, Rostyslav Boutchko, Debasis Mitra

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valerie KobzarenkoBioComputing Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA.
Suzanne L BakerMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Mustafa JanabiMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Woon-Seng ChoongMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Grant T GullbergDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Youngho SeoDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rostyslav BoutchkoSolvingDynamics, Inc.
Debasis MitraBioComputing Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA.

Funding

Dynamic cardiac SPECTR01HL135490 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GULLBERG, GRANT T, SEO, YOUNGHO · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
INCREASING CLINICAL ACCESS BY REDUCING SCAN TIME OF DYNAMIC NUCLEAR CARDIAC IMAGING WITH SUPERIOR DIAGNOSISR15EB030807 · NIBIB · FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MITRA, DEBASIS · 2021 to 2021
$455k
New Approach to Quantitative Beta Amyloid Imaging Using PETR43AG059500 · NIA · SOLVINGDYNAMICS, INC. · PI HUBER, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2018
$150k
National Science Foundation 1819453NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135490NIA NIH HHS R43 AG059500NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB030807NIH HHS R01HL135490NIH HHS R15EB030807NIH HHS R43AG059500-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDynamic positron emission tomography (PET) enables the quantification of physiological parameters of radiotracers employed in the investigation of neuropsychiatric disorders. We previously introduced a factor analysis-based algorithm, Cluster-Initialized Factor Analysis (CIFA), designed to overcome the problem of specifying reference regions. CIFA is capable of automatically extracting distinct radiotracer binding distributions across many modalities based on the differences in tracer dynamics, and thus can distinguish regions of specific- and non-specific binding without requiring prior segmentation. PURPOSE: Our goal is to quantitatively validate the ability of CIFA to resolve different dynamic biological processes by comparing the output of the algorithm to an independent benchmark. As an intermediate goal, we aim to create a physical phantom capable of modeling unique aspects of dynamic imaging and to use this phantom as the benchmark in evaluating CIFA.

methodsCIFA was used to reconstruct

resultsWe directly evaluated CIFA's performance in analyzing each of the 10 dynamic datasets by computing the Pearson correlation coefficient between the estimated outputs and the ground truth tissue TACs and corresponding tissue distributions. For seven out of 10 modeled dynamics, which captured the full spectrum of realistically expected tissue TAC shapes, the curve correlation of the specific binding tissue was above 95%.

conclusionsThis work formulated an innovative process by combining a physical phantom design with PET images for evaluating the application of CIFA in the extraction of dynamic TACs from dynamic PET image data. In most cases the CIFA algorithm accurately reproduced the dynamics of the phantom simulated data.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsBrainCluster AnalysisHumansFADSPETphysical phantom

Identifiers

PMID40450381
PMCPMC12956687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.