ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Risk factors and predictive nomogram for non-curative resection in patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a predictive scoring system for titanium clip retention at six months after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric cancers with different endoscopic curability categories after endoscopic submucosal dissection and related risk factors of non-curative resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Discrepancies between preoperative assessment and final pathological criteria in early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to determine independent clinicopathological factors that can predict submucosal invasion and non-curative resection (NCR) outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC).
methodsData were collected from consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between 2016 and 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted using the chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors independently predicting both submucosal invasion and NCR. These factors were used to construct predictive nomograms.
resultsA total of 511 patients (535 EGC lesions) underwent ESD. Of these, 452 were curative (84.7%), and 83 (15.5%) were non-curative. Multivariate analysis revealed that location in the body and fundus or cardia of the stomach, larger tumor size (≥ 30 mm), and histological undifferentiated type were independent risk factors for submucosal invasion and deep submucosal invasion in patients with EGC (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size of 20 ~ 29 mm, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, elevated lesions, depressed lesions, undifferentiated tumors and submucosal invasion were all independent predictors of NCR for EGCs (all P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomogram model for predicting submucosal invasion and non-curative resection was 0.821 (95% CI, 0.758 ~ 0.884) and 0.937 (95%CI, 0.889 ~ 0.985), respectively.
conclusionsWe developed nomograms to predict the risk of submucosal invasion and NCR prior to ESD. These predictive factors in addition to the existing ESD criteria can help provide the best treatment option for patients with EGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.