ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Elevated neutrophil-monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of CBC‑derived inflammation indices with prevalent CKD: a cross‑sectional analysis of a Chinese data set and NHANES.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Interdialytic blood pressure is independent of weight gain and correlated with serum angiotensin II levels in adults.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Association of inflammatory markers and surgical intervention with postoperative pneumonia in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture: A propensity score-matched cohort study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between the neutrophil-monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (NMLR) and adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes remains unclear. This study explored the association between NMLR, adverse cardiovascular events, and CKD progression.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes between November 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into tertiles according to NMLR values. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), while the secondary outcome was CKD progression. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to describe the association between elevated NMLR and the risk of adverse outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify risk factors contributing to poor prognosis. Nomograms were developed to predict event-free survival, with their performance validated using the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsA total of 586 patients were included in this study. Over a median follow-up period of 23 months, at least one adverse event occurred in 225 patients (38.4%). The risk of MACEs, CKD progression, or both gradually increased across the NMLR tertiles (21.9% vs. 22.1% vs. 35.4%, p for trend = 0.001; 18.4% vs. 23.6% vs. 30.8%, p for trend = 0.004; and 31.6% vs. 35.9% vs. 47.7%, p for trend = 0.001, respectively). RCS showed an elevated risk of MACEs, CKD progression, or both with increasing NMLR (HR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.20, 1.70]; HR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.23, 1.61]; HR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.23, 1.55], respectively; all p < 0.001).
conclusionsIncreased NMLR was positively correlated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events and CKD progression in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, and routine assessment of NMLR, particularly in those above 1.6, may aid in effective risk stratification and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.