ArticleMedical physics2025
Design and characterization of a novel scintillator array for UHDR PBS proton therapy surface dosimetry.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commissioning and Validation of a Synchrocyclotron - Based Ultra-High-Dose-Rate Beamline for FLASH.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Experimental characterization of proton minibeam therapy delivery under FLASH dose-rate conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Wide area surface dosimetry with conformal scintillator array for external beam radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Pulse-by-pulse ultra-high resolution scintillation imaging of proton FLASH beams produced by a gantry-mounted synchrocyclotron.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Emulating Clinical Workflow of Scintillator Array Dosimetry for FLASH Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Advancing Proton Therapy: Integration of Minibeam Spatial Fractionation and FLASH Dose Rates.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltrahigh dose rate (UHDR) proton therapy has shown promise in normal tissue sparing by enhancing the therapeutic ratio through a method termed the FLASH effect. As in all radiotherapy, accurate in vivo dosimetry is crucial for quality assurance of safe and efficient treatment delivery. However, this remains a challenge for UHDR as existing dosimetry systems lack the spatial and temporal resolution required to verify dose and dose rate in complex anatomical regions, especially for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and evaluate a novel 3D surface dosimetry method for UHDR PBS proton therapy using high-speed imaging of a scintillator array, coupled with stereovision to provide real-time, high-resolution surface dose monitoring during treatment. The spatial, temporal, and dosimetric components of the proposed system are validated via imaging of a custom QA phantom and are compared against a gafchromic film reading of the same field delivered onto a flat surface.
methodsA freely deformable multielement scintillator array was designed with a single element pitch of 7.5 mm and interelement gap of 0.5 mm. Scintillation linearity with dose was evaluated along with the variation in scintillator response with increasing imaging and irradiation angles. Water-equivalent thickness (WET) testing was conducted to evaluate beam attenuation at two energy levels. Scintillation emission in response to dose delivery was imaged at 1000 Hz using a high frame rate camera (BeamSite Ultra, DoseOptics LLC) and the array position was monitored via a 2-camera stereovision system. Imaging system setup was validated using a custom 3D QA phantom to assess spatial accuracy and guide systematic setup correction. Stereovision properties of each array element were used to guide angular emission correction, and geometric transformation to beams-eye-view (BEV). Kernel-based residual spot fitting was applied to derive cumulative dose maps which were then compared to the flat film dose profile of a 5 × 5 cm UHDR PBS delivery using 3%/2 mm gamma analysis. PBS and maximum dose rate maps were also calculated.
resultsSystem setup achieved an average localization error of 0.62 mm, surpassing the typical 1+ mm threshold used in clinical practice. Intensity correction based on angular information was applied and yielded a cumulative spot dose uncertainty of ∼1% (5.428 mGy). The processed dose map was compared to film via gamma analysis with 3%/2 mm criteria and showed a 99.9% passing rate, indicating high agreement between the planned and measured dose profiles. The WET of the scintillator array was measured to be 1.1 mm, minimizing its impact on dose distribution.
conclusionThe novel scintillator array system provides accurate, real-time surface dose monitoring with high spatial and temporal resolution, making it a promising tool for in vivo dosimetry in UHDR proton therapy. Future work will focus on optimizing the system and expanding its application to other modalities, such as photon and electron therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.