Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450268›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on practice, satisfaction, and self-confidence among nursing students in mental health nursing class.

Nida Jawabreh, Ayman Hamdan-Mansour, Lobna Harazne, Ahmad Ayed

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nida JawabrehFaculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine.
Ayman Hamdan-MansourSchool of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Lobna HarazneFaculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine.
Ahmad AyedFaculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine. Ahmad.juma@aaup.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of employing high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in enhancing mental health nursing students' practice, satisfaction, and self-confidence in contrast to a group of students undergoing traditional nursing education methods.

methodsA quasi-experimental pre and post-test, two groups study was conducted from March to June 2024. The study conducted with 75 nursing students from Arab American University Palestine and An-Najah National University. The Educational Practices Questionnaire-Curriculum and Learner Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in learning method were used to assess nursing students' practice, satisfaction, and self-confidence. Normality of data was confirmed using Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical t-tests were used to compare between the two groups.

resultThe results revealed significant differences in the educational practice, satisfaction, and self-confidence scores between the experimental and control groups (p < 0.05). Specifically, the educational practice scores in the experimental group (M = 73.3 ± SD 5.62) was higher than that in the control group (M = 61.4 ± SD 6.82). Also, the mean of the student's satisfaction scores in the experimental group (M = 21.8 ± SD 2.35) was higher than that in the control group (M = 18.1 ± SD 4.84). Furthermore, the mean of the student self-confidence scores in the experimental group (M = 35.9 ± SD 3.47) was higher than that in the control group (M = 29.1 ± SD 6.69).

conclusionThe study supports using high-fidelity simulation alongside clinical site experiences to link nursing knowledge and practice. Consequently, mental health nursing students' benefit from advanced training that maintains their competency, theoretical knowledge, clinical judgment, collaborative functioning, leadership, and communication skills. While high-fidelity simulation enhances learning in mental health nursing education, it should be viewed as a complementary approach rather than a replacement for actual clinical placements. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ConfidenceHigh-fidelity simulationMental health nursingPracticeSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40450268
PMCPMC12125790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.