ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nurses' assessments of the work environment, organisational culture and work arrangements: a cross-sectional study of Estonian hospitals in 1999, 2009 and 2021.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses play a vital role in patient care, and their perceptions of their work environment are crucial for healthcare quality. A supportive and well-resourced work environment enhances the quality of care and increases employee commitment. The physical environment directly influences nurses' well-being and efficiency, while a culture that fosters collaboration and communication is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring high-quality care. This study aimed to analyse nurses' assessments of the work environment, organisational culture and work organisation over three decades (1999, 2009 and 2021) to understand their connection to changes in nursing activities over time. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire.
methodsA cross-sectional survey methodology was adopted. Descriptive statistical analysis, correlation analysis and logistic regression analysis were conducted via IBM SPSS. These analyses sought to track temporal changes, explore relationships between workforce resources and nursing activities, and investigate the determinants of the perceived nurse-to-patient ratio.
resultsIn the work environment domain, the perceived quality of the physical work environment remained stable, although the nurse-to-patient ratio increased insufficiently. Changes in organisational culture yielded improvements in communication and the psychosocial work environment but reductions in the quality of collaboration. With respect to work organisation, a greater standardisation of nursing work emerged over time. The logistic regression analysis indicated that nurses working in regional hospitals and departments with more beds more frequently considered the nurse-to-patient ratio to be insufficient.
conclusionsThe nurses' views showed that despite the increased health care workforce, the nurse-to-patient ratio was often seen as insufficient. Although the quality of the physical environment either remained stable or improved, organisational culture shifts indicated less group work and greater multiprofessional cooperation. This study underscores the necessity of a comprehensive approach for evaluating the nurse-to-patient ratio, integrating both quantitative and qualitative measures to effectively gauge and improve the nursing work environment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.