ArticleBMC palliative care2025
The use of wearable sensor technology to enhance supportive care in hospitalized palliative patients (Support trial): a prospective preliminary pilot study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Electronic Monitoring of Vital Signs in Hospitalised Adults: A Nursing Focused Scoping Review of Clinical, Economic and Implementation Outcomes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Detecting Distress in Cognitively Impaired People to Prevent Suffering: Protocol for an Observational Feasibility Study of a Radar-Based Technology Augmented with Photoplethysmographic Sensors and Audio Signals (SURREAL).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Continuous remote monitoring of postoperative vital signs with the Biobeat patch: A multicenter prospective observational study.PloS one · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous monitoring of vital parameters using wearable devices offers potential benefits in palliative care, such as early detection of clinical deterioration and improving symptom management. However, evidence supporting their feasibility and utility in hospitalized palliative care patients remains scarce.
methodsThis prospective pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of continuous vital sign monitoring in hospitalized palliative care patients using wrist-worn and chest-wall devices. The study was conducted from October 2023 to November 2024 and included hospitalized patients at a university hospital. Eligible participants were required to provide written informed consent. Patients were monitored for up to 30 days or until discharge or death. Data acquisition focused on the quantity and quality of recorded parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation, as well as advanced hemodynamic variables. Challenges in recruitment, device performance, and data reliability were assessed.
resultsA total of 275 patients were screened, with 263 excluded for not meeting eligibility criteria. Of the nine patients who provided written informed consent, two withdrew consent before study interventions, leaving seven participants. Among these, one patient completed the maximum study duration, three were discharged to outpatient care, and three died during hospitalization. Wrist-worn devices yielded valid data for 61.5% of the monitored time (median: 57.6%; range: 20.1-78.3%), while chest-wall devices achieved 55.2% (median: 62.3%; range: 3.6-100%). Heart rate and respiratory rate showed excellent reliability (> 99% data availability), whereas oxygen saturation exhibited poor performance (45.1%). The interval between the last recorded device measurement and time of death ranged from 0 to 25 min. Recruitment challenges, including strict consent requirements, resulted in premature study termination, as achieving the target sample size of 25 patients was deemed unfeasible.
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrates the potential of continuous monitoring technologies in palliative care, but inconsistent data availability limits the ability to recommend their routine use at this stage. Despite these challenges, the promising results highlight the need for further studies to improve device reliability and explore the broader applicability of this technology in palliative care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.