ArticleBMC neurology2025
Machine learning algorithms to predict stroke in China based on causal inference of time series analysis.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early detection of chronic kidney disease based on a SURD-enhanced machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning performance for a small dataset: random oversampling improves data imbalances and fairness.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for 30-day readmission risk in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a retrospective cohort study with SHAP interpretability analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceIdentifying and managing high-risk populations for stroke in a targeted manner is a key area of preventive healthcare.
objectiveTo assess machine learning (ML) models and causal inference of time series analysis for predicting stroke clinically meaningful model.
designThis is a retrospective cohort study and data is from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) assessed 11,789 adults in China from 2011 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from June 1 to December 1, 2024.
settingCHARLS adopts a multi-stage probability sampling method, covering samples from 28 provinces, and collects data every two years through computer-aided personal interviews (CAPI).
participantsThis study employed a combination of Vector Autoregression (VAR) model and Graph Neural Networks (GNN) to systematically construct dynamic causal inference. Multiple classic classification algorithms were compared, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gradient Boosting, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) algorithm was used to undersample a small number of samples and employed Stratified K-fold Cross Validation. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): AUC (Area Under the Curve), Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1 Score, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).
resultsThis study included a total of 11,789 participants, including 6,334 females (53.73%) and 5,455 males (46.27%), with an average age of 65 years. Introduction of dynamic causal inference features has significantly improved the performance of almost all models. The area under the ROC curve of each model ranged from 0.78 to 0.83, indicating significant difference (P < 0.01). Among all the models, the Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the highest performance and stability. Model explanation and feature importance analysis generated model interpretation that illustrated significant contributors associated with risks of stroke. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study proposes a stroke risk prediction method that combines dynamic causal inference with machine learning models, significantly improving prediction accuracy and revealing key health factors that affect stroke. The research results indicate that dynamic causal inference features have important value in predicting stroke risk, especially in capturing the impact of changes in health status over time on stroke risk. By further optimizing the model and introducing more variables, this study provides theoretical basis and practical guidance for future stroke prevention and intervention strategies.
trial registrationIRB00001052-11015.1.2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.