ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Lung recruitment maneuver improves right and left ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuver in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Lung-Cardiovascular Interactions and Derangements in ARDS.Comprehensive physiology · 2026Review
- Advances in Imaging and Physiology-Guided Personalized Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung recruitment maneuvers (LRM) and high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may benefit some patients by reopening non- or poorly aerated alveoli. However, the effects of opening the lung with LRM on hemodynamics remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the direct impact of LRM on cardiac function in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
methodsThis post-hoc analysis included 34 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS from two prospective cohort studies. The LRM consisted in a gradual increase in PEEP, starting from 25 cmH2O (PEEPpre, before the recruitment maneuver at PEEP 25 cmH2O) until reaching 40 cmH2O. After LRM, PEEP was decreased to 25 cmH2O (PEEPpost, after the recruitment maneuver, also at PEEP 25 cmH2O) followed by a decremental PEEP titration. We compared the size and function of the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) between PEEPpre and PEEPpost.
resultsThe respiratory system compliance significantly increased from 21 ± 7 ml/cmH2O at PEEPpre to 24 ± 7 ml/cmH2O at PEEPpost (p < 0.001), indicating effective lung recruitment. The RV end-diastolic diameter and the RV/LV ratio decreased after LRM (51 ± 11 vs. 41 ± 9 mm; p < 0.001, and 1.05 ± 0.21 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18; p < 0.001, respectively), suggesting reduced pulmonary vascular resistance. The RV free wall strain improved from -22 ± 10 to -25 ± 8% (p = 0.040). The cardiac index significantly increased from 2.1 ± 0.6 to 2.4 ± 0.7 L/min/m2 (p < 0.001) due to improved LV function, as demonstrated by a lower LV global longitudinal strain at PEEPpost (-16 ± 4% vs. -19 ± 3%, p = 0.002).
conclusionsLRM may benefit both the lungs and the heart. The increase in transpulmonary pressure leads to an expansion in aerated lung volume, potentially reducing lung overdistension and collapse, thereby lowering RV afterload and improving RV systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.