ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Evaluation of methylation changes in blood cells of COVID-19 patients as a biomarker of severity of the infection.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing DNA Methylation Landscapes in Peripheral Blood from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA number of studies have shown that methylomes of blood cells of COVID-19 patients display infection-related methylation changes. Those methylation abnormalities were associated with clinical outcomes of the infection and, thus, can potentially be utilized as biomarkers in clinical COVID-19 management. However, a number of parameters need to be assessed, before a clinical use of a biomarker candidate is proposed, with the most important one being reproducible detection in independent target populations.
methodsWe benchmarked data reported in publications investigating genome-wide methylation changes occurring in blood cells during SARS-CoV-2 virus infection to assess potential applicability of these changes as biomarkers in clinical management of COVID-19 patients.
resultsWe identified nine studies, in which infection-related genome-wide methylation changes in blood cells of COVID-19 patients were reported and associations of those changes with outcomes of the infection was assessed. Our benchmarking analysis showed that each of those studies included patients with different clinical characteristics and each study utilized different symptoms assessment criteria. Most importantly, no uniform data analysis methodologies to identify virus-related methylation changes were used in the analyzed studies. Consequently, analyzed studies, except for one, which was based on uniform data analysis workflow applied across independent patient cohorts, reported sufficiently uniform results that would allow to propose the use of the identified infection-related methylation changes as biomarkers for clinical management of COVID-19 patients.
conclusionsDue to lack of coherence between studies reporting SARS-CoV-2 associated methylation changes in blood, the potential use of already reported methylation changes as biomarkers for clinical management of COVID-19 patients needs to be further assessed in rigorously controlled studies. At the same time unified data analysis framework appears to be the most critical in development of biomarkers associated with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.