ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
One-sample missing DNA-methylation value imputation.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the most popular methods for missing DNA-methylation value imputation rely on exploiting methylation patterns across multiple samples from the same population. However, if there is significant variability between individuals or limited data available, these methods might produce biased results. This situation has prompted researchers to seek alternative approaches for handling single-sample data, particularly in the context of personalized medicine. Accordingly, we propose One-Sample Methyl Imputation (OSMI), an imputation method that can also be used in single-sample applications.
resultsThe proposed method in single-subject cases yielded an average imputation accuracy of RMSE = 0.2713 (95%-CI from 0.2696 to 0.2730) in β-value units (range: 0-1) based on real 450 K BeadChip data sets of 3,402 individuals. It is possible to take the affiliation of individual CpGs to CpG islands into account during the imputation of missing methylation values. This improves the imputation accuracy. In addition, the accuracy of imputation depends in general on the density of CpG sites on DNA-methylation microarrays and increases as the CpG site density increases. OSMI has low memory and computational requirements.
conclusionsOSMI uses a single methylome to impute missing values quickly at very low memory constraints. Its imputation accuracy is inferior to other methods if multiple samples are available and these samples are reasonably similar, but OSMI represents a useful addition to the imputation toolbox for the case of single-sample applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.