Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450202›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Communities against cancer: a qualitative study assessing the effectiveness of a community engagement initiative in improving cancer awareness for marginalised communities.

David Wright, Rebecca Foster, Phoebe Miles, Nicola Duffield, Sally Rickard, Jane Frankland, Lynn Calman, Claire Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David WrightThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK. D.Wright@soton.ac.uk.
Rebecca FosterThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Phoebe MilesThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Nicola DuffieldWessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 4GX, UK.
Sally RickardWessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 4GX, UK.
Jane FranklandThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Lynn CalmanThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Claire FosterThe Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Building 67/4061, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarginalised communities (including minoritised ethnic groups and people with lower socioeconomic status) often present with a late cancer stage at diagnosis, affecting survival. This is due to many factors including cultural barriers, mistrust of health services and low levels of cancer awareness. Communities Against Cancer (CAC) aimed to promote cancer awareness and healthy lifestyles and help-seeking behaviours for marginalised communities through a grant-scheme that provided funding for community-led projects, which ran from 1st January 2021 - 31st December 2022. This paper reports findings from a study that assessed whether CAC met its aims and the characteristics of successfully delivered projects.

methodsA qualitative approach was used involving interviews and observations of meetings and community activities, supported by documentary analysis of minutes, grant applications, reports and quantitative descriptions of grant-level data. Participants included representatives from the funder and grant distributor, community advocates, applicants and recipients of CAC funding. Thirty-seven people were interviewed, all of whom were invited to a second follow-up interview. Twenty-one participants agreed to a second interview, resulting in 58 interviews in total. Interview transcripts and observation fieldnotes were analysed thematically.

resultsCAC community grants encouraged: 1) healthy behaviours (e.g. families on low incomes reported healthier diets); 2) screening and PSA testing uptake (e.g. a group representing neurodivergent people created a film of a breast screening unit, encouraging attendance); 3) awareness of signs and symptoms (e.g. one radio station for South Asian communities broadcast an episode on signs of prostate cancer, their most downloaded programme); 4) help seeking behaviours (e.g. one South Asian community group held meetings with pharmacists, primary care and hospital staff, building trust with local services). Seven characteristics were identified for successful projects (defined as meeting at least one of the initiative's aims: raising awareness of healthy behaviours, screening uptake, awareness of signs and symptoms, and help-seeking behaviour). The characteristics were: 1) projects are designed with an understanding of the community; 2) effective planning before delivery; 3) projects are co-created with the community; 4) alignment with group values; 5) building community members' confidence; 6) effective communication; 7) adaptability and evaluation.

conclusionsThe community-based grant model adopted by CAC enabled community members to self-define effective strategies to deliver cancer messages to their communities. As a result, the CAC initiative met its aims of promoting cancer awareness, encouraging healthy lifestyles and help-seeking behaviours by ensuring activites were fully tailored and co-created with marginalised communities.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionNeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCancer awarenessCancer preventionEarly detectionEquality and diversityMarginalised communities

Identifiers

PMID40450202
PMCPMC12125787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.