ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Interpretable multi-label classification model for predicting post-anesthesia care unit complications: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are potential associations between post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) complications that significantly impact enhanced recovery after surgery. Timely identification of these signs is essential for implementing comprehensive, systematic management strategies and delivering personalized anesthetic care. However, relevant studies are currently limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable multi-label classification model to predict PACU complications concurrently.
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and elective surgery and were transferred to the PACU after surgery. The patients were dynamically monitored and evaluated for the occurrence of six common PACU complications: respiratory adverse events, hypothermia, hemodynamic instability, nausea/vomiting, agitation/delirium, and pain. A multi-label classification model was developed on the basis of 16 key features, and a Markov network was embedded to quantify and analyze the association network among these complications. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to conduct interpretability analysis of the model.
resultsOf the 16,838 total patients, 6,830 (40.6%) experienced at least one complication. In the training cohort, 2,125 (57.0%) patients experienced two or more complications at the same time. The AUCs for the six complications in the three cohorts ranged from 0.735 to 0.914, 0.720 to 0.920, and 0.693 to 0.928, respectively. Respiratory adverse events performed best. Age, gender, BMI, duration of anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia emerged as the five most important features. The relative importance of respiratory adverse events to hemodynamic instability was the highest.
conclusionThe integration of a multi-label classification model with interpretable methods has significant advantages in simultaneously predicting PACU complications, identifying the risk factors for specific complications, optimizing postoperative resource allocation, and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.