Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450188›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: insights from 468 cases.

Giosuè Giordano Incognito, Katja Jakopič Maček, Mija Blaganje, Kristina Drusany Starič, Giuseppe Ettore, Carla Ettore, Maša Lukež Podgornik, Ivan Verdenik, Nataša Kenda Šuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giosuè Giordano IncognitoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Maternal Child Department, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Via Palermo 636, 95122, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1818-0105
Katja Jakopič MačekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mija BlaganjeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristina Drusany StaričDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5548-4116
Giuseppe EttoreObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Maternal Child Department, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Via Palermo 636, 95122, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-7682
Carla EttoreObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Maternal Child Department, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Via Palermo 636, 95122, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-2801
Maša Lukež PodgornikDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0009-0001-1423-5842
Ivan VerdenikMedical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-5799
Nataša Kenda ŠusterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. natasa@kenda.si.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-5239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRetained products of conception (RPOC) are a common complication following pregnancy. Office hysteroscopy (OH) is increasingly used for diagnostics and management due to its minimally invasive nature. However, incidence of incomplete OH removal and procedures in which no RPOC are identified despite prior suspicion remains a concern. This study aimed to identify factors associated with these outcomes to improve patient selection and procedural success.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients referred for OH for presumed RPOC between August 2015 and April 2023 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. Inclusion criteria included hemodynamically stable patients with prolonged bleeding and/or suspicious ultrasound (US) findings post-pregnancy. Patients with RPOC thickness of more than 30 mm or strong tissue vascularization on US were excluded. Data on patient demographics, US features, and procedural outcomes were analyzed.

resultsOut of the 468 patients, RPOC removal was performed in 333 cases (71.2%), of which 225 (67.6%) were successfully completed, while in 135 cases (28.8%), the procedure was only diagnostic due to the absence of RPOC. Regarding procedural success, neither the pregnancy outcome, i.e., termination of pregnancy (TOP) vs delivery, nor gestational age significantly correlated with it. Longer time from pregnancy end to OH significantly improved procedural success in both groups, after TOP (p = 0.025) and in cases of large RPOC after delivery (p < 0.001). Parity significantly altered procedural success only in the delivery group (p < 0.007). The success rate of the procedure was significantly higher in cases when only small RPOC were observed (p < 0.001). Absence of RPOC occurred more frequently following TOP than after delivery (p < 0.001). Procedures in which no RPOC were confirmed were significantly associated with a longer interval between pregnancy end and OH in both TOP (p = 0.013) and delivery group (p = 0.003). Gestational age significantly correlated with the absence of RPOC only in the delivery group (p = 0.003). The likelihood of not confirming RPOC was higher where US thickness and length were lower (p = 0.007 and p = 0.011, respectively).

conclusionOH is effective for managing RPOC with a high success rate, but the absence of RPOC in a considerable number of OH-treated patients stresses the need for better diagnostic criteria and patient selection to minimize overtreatments. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize the timing and indications for OH.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresHysteroscopyPlacenta, RetainedAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSloveniaTreatment OutcomeMinimally invasive surgeryOffice hysteroscopyRetained products of conceptionUterine diseases

Identifiers

PMID40450188
PMCPMC12374857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.