ArticleScientific reports2025
Analyzing the use of fact-checking tools in disaster-risk reduction in Europe through the lens of the heuristic-systematic model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond coexistence: the asymmetric interplay of health risk and promotion pathways driven by communication legacies across emerging and recurring epidemics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Journalists, emergency responders, and the general public facing natural and anthropogenic disasters frequently disseminate emergency information via social media. The spread of fake news during disasters can, however, disrupt the crisis management process and increase victim numbers. Identifying false information can curb its spread and reduce its impact on people's attitudes and behaviors. Understanding how and why people in a disaster situation use fact-checking tools is crucial, as disaster-risk messages containing false content can usually be detected using systematic or heuristic processing. This study applies the heuristic-systematic model (HSM) to analyze social media users' intention to use fact-checking tools. The empirical study data derived from 202 questionnaires collected through an online survey of residents of countries of the European Union. The results of structural equation modeling show the credibility of using HSM to analyze the intention to use fact-checking tools. About 33% of the changes in people's intention to use fact-checking tools are predicted by this model. This study has implications for the use of theoretical models in communication science to predict intention to use fact-checking tools in disaster risk-reduction situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.