ArticleScientific reports2025
Health literacy as the most important covariate of self-rated health in adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building health-literate artificial intelligence.Nature human behaviour · 2026Review
- Health literacy, dietary behavior and body mass index in male and female Norwegian conscripts. A cross-sectional study.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying risk factors of poor self-rated health during adolescence is critical for the subsequent health status. The aim of this study was to investigate the most important determinants of self-rated health (SRH) in Iranian adolescents. This was a population-based cross-sectional study recruiting 605 adolescents in Isfahan, Iran. Simple random sampling method was employed. Multivariable linear regression model was utilized for determining the adjusted beta coefficient for health literacy (HL) and the study main confounders. The SRH of 93.2% of participants was satisfied or very satisfied. The majority of participants had moderate or high levels of HL (94.7%). Based on the standardized linear regression coefficients, HL was the most important correlates of SRH followed by happiness and loneliness, respectively. The mean of SRH in those with high HL, on average, was 0.48 units better than those with low HL (95% CI 0.23, 0.72), P < 0.001). We also found that happiness and satisfaction in child-parent relationship were positively correlated with SRH. Inversely, the history of passive smoking, loneliness and higher values of BMI significantly decreased the SRH in adolescents. We demonstrated health literacy, happiness and loneliness as the most important correlates of SRH. Considering the central role of adolescence on later health, the findings of current study imply that adolescence health promotion strategies, beside the formerly well-demonstrated factors, will best be targeted on health literacy to impact the general health positively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.