ArticleScientific reports2025
Vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction for the simultaneous derivatization and extraction of five primary aliphatic amines in water sample.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Optimization of a Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Multiclass Pesticides in Environmental Waters.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Matrix cleanup assisted extraction of phenolic pollutants from diverse wastewaters using a magnetic core shell adsorbent.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction was used to extract and derivatize propylamine, butylamine, pentylamine, benzylamine, and sec-butylamine in various environmental water and refinery effluent samples. Herein, µL-volume of butyl chloroformate as a derivatization agent was added to 1,1,2-trichloroethane as an extraction solvent, allowing for simultaneous extraction and derivatization of the amines. The derivatization agent reacted with the amines in an alkaline medium under mild conditions to create their related carbamates. The carbamate derivatives obtained from primary amines performed well in gas chromatography system. Various affecting parameters of the method, such as the derivatization agent amount, type of extraction solvent, ionic strength of solution, pH, vortexing time, and centrifuging time and rate were carefully optimized. In the end, gas chromatography-flame ionization detector was used to separate, identify, and quantify the enriched derivatives. Under optimal conditions, enrichment factors varied from 440 to 515, while extraction recovery of the desired amines was between 88 and 103%. The limits of detection for amines ranged from 0.4 to 1.0 µg L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.