Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40450031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting photodegradation rate constants of water pollutants on TiO

Mahia V Solout, Jahan B Ghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahia V SoloutChemistry Faculty, School of Sciences, University of Tehran, POB 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran.
Jahan B GhasemiChemistry Faculty, School of Sciences, University of Tehran, POB 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran. jahan.ghasemi@ut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photocatalytic materials, which are known for their ability to harness solar energy to facilitate chemical reactions, are widely used in environmental remediation, including wastewater treatment. The efficiency of photocatalytic reactions in degrading pollutants is influenced by several factors, making parameter optimization time-consuming. In this context, machine learning techniques provide an appropriate solution for designing optimal photocatalysts. In addition to experimental variables such as solution pH and temperature, the molecular structure of the contaminant significantly affects the reaction efficiency. Molecular graphs are powerful tools for representing molecular structures for machine learning methods. This study integrates structural and five common experimental features in photocatalysis to develop graph neural networks (GNNs) for predicting the degradation rate constants of the organic water contaminants using TiO

Indexed as

Experimental featuresGraph neural networkMachine learningMolecular graphsPhotodegradation rate constantTitanium dioxideWater pollutants

Identifiers

PMID40450031
PMCPMC12126497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.