ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting lncRNA and disease associations with graph autoencoder and noise robust gradient boosting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliable evaluation and learning in multi-input biological association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
lncRNAs are densely related to many human diseases. Identifying new lncRNA-disease associations (LDAs) conduces to better deciphering mechanisms of diseases, finding new biomarkers, and further promoting their diagnosis and treatment. In this manuscript, we devise an LDA prediction framework called LDA-GARB. LDA-GARB first combines nonnegative matrix factorization to extract linear features of lncRNAs and diseases. Next, it computes lncRNA similarity and disease similarity and adopts a graph autoencoder to extract nonlinear features of lncRNAs and diseases. Subsequently, the extracted features are concatenated as a vector. Finally, it takes the obtained vector as inputs and designs a noise-robust gradient boosting model to uncover potential associations from unknown lncRNA-disease pairs. To investigate the LDA-GARB performance, we used precision, recall, accuracy, F1-score, AUC, and AUPR as measurement metrics and performed multiple comparison experiments. First, it was benchmarked with four representative LDA prediction methods, i.e., SDLDA, LDNFSGB, LDAenDL, and LDA-VGHB, under 5-fold cross validations on lncRNAs, diseases, and lncRNA-disease pairs. Next, it was compared with four representative boosting models, i.e., XGBoost, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, under the above three different cross validations. Subsequently, the performance of LDA-GARB against LDA-LNSUBRW, GAMCLDA, LDA-VGHB, LDAGM, and GANLDA on imbalanced data was evaluated. We also performed parameter sensitivity analysis and ablation experiments. The results demonstrated that LDA-GARB improved LDA prediction. Finally, LDA-GARB was applied to predict potential associated lncRNAs for colorectal cancer and breast cancer. CCDC26 and HAR1A have been inferred to have an association with the two cancers, respectively. As a useful LDA identification tool, LDA-GARB is freely available at https://github.com/smiling199/LDA-GARB .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.