Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40449945›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Exploring perinatal loneliness as a key social determinant of perinatal mental ill health in the UK: findings from a multidisciplinary consensus statement exercise that mapped knowledge about measurement, prevalence, antecedents, impacts and interventions, and agreed future priorities for research, policy and practice.

Ruth Naughton-Doe, Rebecca Nowland, Jacqueline Kent-Marvick, Phoebe McKenna-Plumley, Emily Lovett, Thuy-Vy Nguyen, Lindsay Hunter, Nicola Wallis, Florence Gaughan, Katie Hall and 7 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ruth Naughton-DoeBusiness & Society, University of York, York, UK ruth.naughton-doe@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-3476
Rebecca NowlandSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-2425
Jacqueline Kent-MarvickCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Phoebe McKenna-PlumleyQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Emily LovettEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Thuy-Vy NguyenDurham University, Durham, UK.
Lindsay HunterBirmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Nicola WallisUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Florence GaughanSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Katie HallUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Corinna ColellaQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Suzanne WilsonUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Katherine AdlingtonEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth Taylor BuckUniversity of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK.
Sarah ShemerySocial and Political Science, University of Edinburgh School of Arts Culture and Environment, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6191-7629
Naomi FinchSPSW, Univ York, York, UK.
Catrin NooneDurham University, Durham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNew parents are at increased risk of loneliness, which adversely affects parental and infant health and well-being and has been linked to an increased likelihood of parental mental illness. In the UK, perinatal mental illness is estimated to cost £8.1bn a year, predominantly due to lasting poor health and developmental consequences for children. The purpose of this consensus statement is to determine the state of this research field, highlighting key issues for researchers, policymakers and those responsible for perinatal mental health services and interventions. We will also highlight knowledge gaps to be addressed in future perinatal loneliness research. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe Parental Loneliness Research Group held six online meetings between October 2023 and May 2024, attended by academics and practitioners from the UK and USA. Attendees conducted a mapping exercise by appraising published, unpublished and ongoing perinatal loneliness research. The findings were shared with advisory groups, including parents with lived experience of loneliness. A consensus statement was then drafted, reflecting existing knowledge and gaps in the current evidence about the experience of perinatal loneliness in the first 1001 days.

resultsA consensus about the definitions, measurement, prevalence, antecedents, impacts and interventions relevant to perinatal loneliness is outlined. Gaps in the literature are highlighted.

conclusionsDespite emerging research into perinatal loneliness, it is hard to determine prevalence due to limited analyses of national survey data. Recommendations for future research include secondary data analysis; prioritising equality, diversity and inclusion; reconsidering solutions to perinatal loneliness through a social justice lens; co-producing interventions, and rigorous evaluation of existing interventions.

Indexed as

LonelinessMental DisordersParentsSocial Determinants of HealthFemaleHumansMental HealthPerinatal CarePregnancyPrevalenceUnited KingdomMENTAL HEALTHPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant WomenPrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID40449945
PMCPMC12128407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.