ReviewJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
Taking an Evidence-Based Approach to 10 Common Myths About Catatonia: An Educational Review.
Review in Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Narrative Review of Catatonia in Psychosis and Eating Disorders: Common Intersections and Treatment Considerations.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Catatonia is a serious neuropsychiatric disorder associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Despite growing interest in the disorder and the field's advancing understanding, a gap between research and clinical practice persists. This is particularly problematic as prompt recognition is essential to optimal management and improving outcomes. We present an educational review of 10 common myths regarding the recognition, etiology, phenotype, and management of catatonia. We address each myth using an evidence-based approach. A few salient considerations include the broad age range affected by catatonia, the fact that patients with catatonia often have preserved awareness of their surroundings, and the importance of using a validated catatonia screening instrument for reliable identification. By addressing these 10 myths, we aim to reduce the gap between evidence and clinical practice to ultimately improve the care and clinical outcomes of people with catatonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.