ReviewIndian heart journal
A comprehensive review on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): One size does not fit all.
Review in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as clinical evidence of myocardial infarction (MI) without significant obstruction (<50 % stenosis) in coronary angiography, making it a clinically distinct and heterogeneous disorder. Unlike MI associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD), MINOCA is more common in younger women and often involves microvascular dysfunction or vasospastic conditions. Despite recent advancements in understanding MINOCA, its prognosis and predictors remain uncertain, necessitating further research into its pathogenesis. The diverse underlying causes of MINOCA mean that traditional treatment of the "one-size-fits-all" approach used for MICAD may not be appropriate, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies based on accurate diagnosis. There is an urgent need to raise awareness among healthcare providers, implement standardized diagnostic protocols, and conduct targeted research to improve patient outcomes. Multi-centered studies and clinical trials are essential to establish evidence-based therapies and optimize management strategies for MINOCA, ensuring better long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.