ArticleDNA repair2025
Initiation of base excision repair is modulated by nucleosome occupancy modifying sequences.
Article in DNA repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biochemical, structural and mutational landscapes of base excision repair enzymes and cancer: from atomic resolution to tumor signatures.International journal of radiation biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleosome occupancy varies across the genome and plays a critical role in modulating DNA accessibility. While the effect of occupancy on gene expression has been studied, its influence on DNA repair, particularly base excision repair (BER), remains unexplored. In this work, we investigate the relationship between nucleosome occupancy and the initiation of BER by reconstituting nucleosome core particles (NCPs) using four DNA sequences known to modulate nucleosome occupancy in vivo. The results demonstrate that histone-DNA interactions differ significantly among these sequences. Moreover, uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activity is limited to solution-accessible uracil (U) lesion sites on NCPs containing the high occupancy sequences M4 and SB. In contrast, UDG displays high activity on NCPs containing the low occupancy sequences M2 and M3, even at less solution accessible lesion sites. In fact, for NCPs containing the sequence with the lowest occupancy, M2, UDG exhibits high activity regardless of the U lesion position. However, this high level of activity regardless of lesion position was not observed for thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and single-stranded monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1). Instead, the activity of TDG was dictated by the sequence flanking the U with a preference for 5'-UpG-3' and 5'-UpA-3' sequences, consistent with the role of TDG in epigenetic regulation. SMUG1 activity is high at many U sites but is severely hindered in the dyad region. These results highlight the interplay between nucleosome occupancy and BER, offering new insights into the dynamics of chromatin and DNA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.