Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40449022›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

Non-homogeneous distribution of inhibitory inputs among motor units in response to nociceptive stimulation at moderate contraction intensity.

François Hug, François Dernoncourt, Simon Avrillon, Jacob Thorstensen, Manuela Besomi, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Kylie Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François HugUniversité Côte d'Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-558X
François DernoncourtUniversité Côte d'Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France.
Simon AvrillonUniversité Côte d'Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-3528
Jacob ThorstensenSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6821-1547
Manuela BesomiCentre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wolbert van den HoornCentre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-2388
Kylie TuckerSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4976-7483

Funding

French government, through the UCAJEDI InvestmentsNational Research Agency (ANR) ANR-15-IDEX-01National Research Agency (ANR) ANR-24-CE17-5805National Research Agency (ANR) NEUROMOTOR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain significantly influences movement, yet the neural mechanisms underlying the range of observed motor adaptations remain unclear. This study combined experimental data and in silico models to investigate the contribution of inhibitory and neuromodulatory inputs to motor unit behaviour in response to nociceptive stimulation during contractions at 30% of maximal torque. Specifically, we aimed to unravel the distribution pattern of inhibitory inputs to the motor unit pool. Seventeen participants performed isometric knee extension tasks under three conditions: Control, Pain (induced by injecting hypertonic saline into the infra-patellar fat pad) and Washout. We identified large samples of motor units in the vastus lateralis (up to 53/participant) from high-density electromyographic signals, leading to three key observations. First, while motor unit discharge rates significantly decreased during Pain, a substantial proportion of motor units (14.8-24.8%) did not show this decrease and, in some cases, even exhibited an increase. Second, using complementary approaches, we found that pain did not significantly affect neuromodulation, making it unlikely to be a major contributor to the observed changes in motor unit behaviour. Third, we observed a significant reduction in the proportion of common inputs to motor units during Pain. To explore potential neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these results, we simulated the behaviour of motor unit pools with varying distribution patterns of inhibitory inputs. Our simulations support the hypothesis that a non-homogeneous distribution of inhibitory inputs, not strictly organised according to motor unit size, is a key mechanism underlying the motor response to nociceptive stimulation during moderate contraction intensity. KEY POINTS: Pain affects movement, but the neural mechanisms underlying these motor adaptations are not well defined. The traditional view is that pain causes uniform (homogeneous) inhibition among motor units. Recent research has observed differential motor unit responses to experimental pain - some with decreased discharge rates and others with increased discharge rates. Combining experimental data with modelling, we provide compelling evidence of increased inhibition that is non-uniformly distributed across motor units, regardless of their size.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionNociceptionPainAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultcommon inputelectromyographymotor neuronpersistent inward currentsprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID40449022
PMCPMC12148210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.