ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2025
A Survey of the Current Practice for Testing for Neonatal Hypoglycaemia in Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Survey of the Current Practice for Testing for Neonatal Hypoglycaemia in Aotearoa, New Zealand.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsNeonatal hypoglycaemia is the most common metabolic disturbance in newborns and can lead to brain injury. However, the feasibility of implementing a national recommendation to use accurate testing methods to avoid under- and over-diagnosis depends on current practise, preferences, and resources. We therefore sought to identify current testing practises for neonatal hypoglycaemia to inform recommendations for testing, including devices and timing.
methodsAn online survey was sent to relevant clinical unit leaders across the 19 health regions of New Zealand, and to members of the New Zealand College of Midwives who provide home birth services. These individuals were asked to complete the survey themselves or identify the appropriate practitioner in their unit to complete it.
resultsFrom 28th August to 12th December 2023, we obtained 71 responses, which came from more than one profession from all but one health region. The most commonly used devices for measuring glucose concentrations in capillary blood samples were blood gas analysers (20/65, 31%) and i-STAT (12/65, 18%). Devices used did not differ among professions, but the use of blood gas analysers was not reported in primary units. i-STAT (22/80, 28%) and blood gas analyser (19/80, 24%) were also the most preferred testing devices. The timing of blood sampling was reported to be similar for > 70% of respondents.
conclusionsMost healthcare professionals use and prefer accurate blood sampling devices, suggesting implementing a recommendation to use these is likely feasible. However, guidance on the timing of testing is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.