Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40449006›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025

Adaptations to hypoxia in the vertebrate retina.

Michael G Jonz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael G JonzDepartment of Biology & Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-1570

Funding

Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 05571Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 342303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the CNS, the retina maintains high metabolic activity yet is more tolerant to the adverse effects of low oxygen (hypoxia) than the brain. Tissue hypoxia is a component of ischaemia and has devastating effects on the CNS, including neuronal death. Differences in blood supply, oxygen consumption, and the expression of excitatory receptors and oxygen-binding proteins contribute to regional differences in the sensitivity of retinal neurons to hypoxia. Although highly variable and species-dependent, the mammalian retina has the capacity to withstand the effects of oxygen deprivation through ischaemic preconditioning, where a brief, sublethal stimulus imparts protection against subsequent bouts of hypoxia or ischaemia. Decades of research have demonstrated that hypoxia- and anoxia-tolerant ectotherms are adapted to survive weeks or months in the absence of oxygen without damage to the CNS, nor without the need for a preconditioning stimulus. Recent studies provide evidence that, in the retinas of tolerant animals, such as crucian carp, freshwater turtle and goldfish, prolonged oxygen deprivation elicits a reversible reduction in electroretinogram activity. Moreover, inhibitory interneurons of the outer retina involved in visual processing, called horizontal cells, sense hypoxia via mitochondrial ATP-dependent K

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalHypoxiaRetinaAnimalsHumansanoxiagoldfishischaemic preconditioningmKATPretinatolerance

Identifiers

PMID40449006
PMCPMC12576311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.