ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025
Masculinity and colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of men attending state fairs in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuccess in community-based interventions addressing colorectal cancer (CRC) disparities among men relies on their active engagement in screening activities, yet traditional masculinity norms may deter men from participating in preventive health behaviors. PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study examined the association between masculinity barriers to medical care (MBMC) and CRC-screening intent and behaviors among men aged 18-75, attending state fairs in 2 midwestern states.
methodsCRC-screening intent was assessed for all participants. Screening participation and current screening status were also examined among men aged 45-75 years (screening-age eligible). Composite scores were calculated overall and for each MBMC subscale, with higher scores indicating a stronger endorsement of traditional masculine ideologies. Multivariable logistic regression was employed, adjusting for confounders.
resultsOur findings highlight a high prevalence of self-reported CRC-screening behaviors among men in our study sample (n = 937), with 78% expressing intentions to obtain screening. Among screening-age eligible men (n = 377), 79% reported having participated in CRC screening, with 72% being up-to-date (UTD) with screening. A strong inverse relationship was observed between CRC-screening intention and behaviors, and the Health Problem Minimization subscale as well as Fear of Being Perceived as Gay subscale. Conversely, higher scores on the Provider Role subscale were associated with higher odds of having ever participated in CRC screening, and of being UTD with screening.
conclusionsAddressing masculinity-related barriers, particularly Health Problem Minimization, could help increase CRC screening uptake among men. Future intervention strategies should consider reframing CRC screening as an act of self-care and strength, emphasizing health empowerment rather than aligning solely with traditional masculine or provider-role ideologies, which may themselves present limitations. By promoting a broader and more inclusive view of masculinity, interventions can better engage men in preventive health behaviors and ultimately improve CRC-screening adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.