Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448869›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025

DNA forensics at forty: the way forward.

Hirak Ranjan Dash, Noora R Al-Snan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hirak Ranjan DashSchool of Forensic Science, National Forensic Sciences University, Delhi Campus, New Delhi, 110085, India. hirakdash@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-6452
Noora R Al-SnanForensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Science, General Directorate of Criminal Investigation and Forensic Science, Ministry of Interior, Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama, Bahrain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic DNA analysis has transformed criminal investigations since its inception in 1985. Over four decades, this field has evolved through various phases-from the early stages of exploration to today's highly sophisticated methodologies. Key advancements such as the development of rapid DNA analysis techniques, microchip-based systems, and next-generation sequencing have improved the speed, reliability, and utility of DNA forensics. However, despite these technological advances, the field still faces considerable challenges, particularly with increasing case backlogs, limited population-specific databases, and the difficulties associated with analyzing degraded or challenging samples like bones and touch DNA. Emerging technologies such as single-cell genomic analysis, lineage markers, proteomics, and human microbiome analysis offer promising solutions to these challenges. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in forensic workflows is enhancing the ability to analyze complex DNA samples efficiently, paving the way for faster and more accurate results. As forensic DNA analysis enters its next phase, the focus will be on expanding databases, refining quality control and assurance protocols, and standardizing training for forensic professionals worldwide. The journey of forensic DNA analysis over the past 40 years demonstrates a field in continuous development. Although significant progress has been made, there remain opportunities for further innovation, particularly in overcoming the current limitations and addressing ethical and legal concerns. By doing so, forensic DNA analysis will continue to play a pivotal role in the future of criminal justice.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsArtificial IntelligenceDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningSequence Analysis, DNADNAArtificial intelligence (AI) in forensicsDNA databasesForensic DNA analysisNext-generation sequencing (NGS)Rapid DNA technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.