ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResearch steering committees (RSCs) are increasingly recognized as a strategy for stakeholder engagement. Drawing on the experiences of participants from three RSCs involved in health care implementation projects in Brazil, this study aims to examine the contributions of RSCs to implementation research based on their impact on implementation outcomes.
methodsThis descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2024. Shared appreciation groups with eight researchers facilitated consensus on RSC operationalization. Additionally, semistructured interviews with 12 RSC members from three research projects explored the contributions to stakeholder engagement and implementation outcomes. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
resultsThirteen discrete implementation strategies were identified within four categories: use evaluative and iterative strategies, adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and train and educate stakeholders. The RSCs influenced six implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, penetration, and sustainability. Appropriateness and feasibility emerged as the most prominent outcomes.
conclusionResearch steering committees constitute a multifaceted implementation strategy that fosters structured stakeholder engagement. By integrating multiple implementation strategies, they enhance collaboration, contextual adaptation, and shared governance. Their impact on appropriateness and feasibility highlights their relevance as a support mechanism for implementation success and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.