Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448838›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2025

Kangayam and Tharparkar cattle exhibit higher duplications in innate immune genes compared to Sahiwal, Gir, Karan Fries, and Holstein Friesian: insights from an array comparative genomic hybridization.

Mayank Roshan, Ashutosh Vats, Kamlesh Kumari Bajwa, Sanjay Sharma, Menaka Thambiraja, Monika Sodhi, Dheer Singh, Ragothaman M Yennamalli, Suneel Kumar Onteru

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mayank RoshanAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Ashutosh VatsAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Kamlesh Kumari BajwaAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Sanjay SharmaAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Menaka ThambirajaDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613401, India.
Monika SodhiAnimal Biotechnology Division, ICAR - National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Dheer SinghAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. drdheer.singh@gmail.com.
Ragothaman M YennamalliDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613401, India. ragothaman@scbt.sastra.ac.in.
Suneel Kumar OnteruAnimal Biochemistry Division, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology Laboratory, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. suneelvet@gmail.com.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Agricultural Science Fund (ICAR-NASF) F. 572 No. NASF/SUTRA-02/2022-23/50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immunity, the primary defence mechanism, encompasses a range of protective processes like anatomical barriers, cytokine secretion, and the action of various immune cells. Cattle breeds might differ in these processes because of their genetic differences such as copy number variations (CNVs). Therefore, the present investigation employed an array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) approach on breed representative pooled DNA samples to evaluate CNVs across six cattle breeds: four indigenous Indian breeds, Kangayam (KNG), Tharparkar (TP), Sahiwal (SW), Gir (GIR), one crossbred Karan Fries (KF), and one exotic breed, Holstein Friesian (HF). In aCGH, HF DNA was used as control, while test DNA was from the other breeds. Each pooled test DNA sample was a representative of 18 animals belonging to three distinct geographical locations of India. The study using Aberration Detection Method 2 (ADM-2) of Agilent Genomic Workbench revealed the highest number of duplications in KNG (1189 genes), followed by TP (534 genes), and the greatest number of deletions in SW (774 genes). Among these genes, 183 and 76 innate immune genes with hub genes TGF-β1, CD79A, and IL4 showed duplications in KNG and TP, respectively. In SW, 113 innate immune genes with hub genes PSMC5, MAPK1, and AXIN1 showed deletions. In contrast, KF and HF showed no genes with deletions and fewer duplicated innate immunity genes, reflecting either lower genetic variability in their immune gene repertoire or a potential bias due to HF DNA as a control in aCGH. Functional enrichment of innate immune genes revealed duplications in KNG enriched in interleukin-1 receptor (IL1R) activity (p = 9.9 × 10

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationGene DuplicationImmunity, InnateAnimalsBreedingCattleDNA Copy Number VariationsIndia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.