ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma treated with belantamab mafodotin: a German claims data study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the DREAMM-2 trial, belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) monotherapy demonstrated clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Real-world evidence on this patient population is scarce. This study describes real-world baseline characteristics, ocular events, and time-to-event outcomes of patients with RRMM before, during, and after belamaf treatment between August 1, 2020, and March 31, 2023, in Germany based on anonymized health insurance claims data. In the overall cohort (N = 31), the median age was 66 years and all patients had received several MM therapies prior to treatment with belamaf. Of the patients included in the pre-belamaf (n = 31), belamaf (n = 31), and post-belamaf (n = 22) treatment periods, 10 (32.3%), 16 (51.6%), and 15 (68.2%) had at least one recorded ophthalmological visit, respectively. Keratitis was the most frequent among ocular diagnoses of interest across all three study periods. During the belamaf treatment period, seven (22.6%) patients had one or more incident ocular diagnoses of interest, the most frequent being corneal-related events. In the overall cohort, the real-world progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-7.7) and 12.3 months (95% CI 6.9-not evaluable), respectively. Our data emphasize the importance of ocular supportive care during belamaf treatment in real-world clinical practice. Our findings also highlight that RRMM remains an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.