ArticleCardiology and therapy2025
Utility of Screening Fetal Echocardiograms Following Normal Level II Ultrasounds in Fetuses with Siblings with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Cardiology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective Fetal Echocardiogram Referral Program for Pregnancies Affected by Pregestational Diabetes.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Sonographer Grasp and Pincher Strength Before and After Fetal Echocardiograms.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn pregnancies when congenital heart disease (CHD) is present in siblings, fetal echocardiograms (F-echo) are recommended, regardless if there was a prior level II ultrasound (LII-US) that was normal. The goal of this study was to evaluate if any diagnosis of a critical congenital heart disease (CHD) was missed in a fetus who had a sibling with CHD, when a normal LII-US was documented.
methodsRetrospective chart review of all F-echo where the indication was sibling with CHD between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023 was performed. Fetuses were included if they had a LII-US that was read as normal and had a F-echo. Critical CHD was defined as CHD requiring catheterization or surgical intervention < 1 month of age.
resultsA total of 187 F-echo on fetuses who had a sibling with CHD were evaluated, of which 113 met inclusion criteria. LII-US was performed at 21.1 ± 3.3 weeks gestational age and F-echo was performed at 25.4 ± 3.1 weeks gestational age. No patient with a normal LII-US had a diagnosis of a critical CHD by F-echo (negative predictive value = 100%). Six patients that had a negative LII-US were diagnosed with non-critical CHD or cardiac issues postnatally (negative predictive value = 94.7%). F-echo correctly diagnosed two of the six missed LII-US CHD.
conclusionCritical CHD was not missed with a normal LII-US in this at-risk population. F-echo also missed the majority of CHD when a LII-US was read as normal. The cost/benefit of screening F-echo in fetuses with siblings with CHD should be evaluated if a normal LII-US has been performed. Larger studies are needed to determine if these findings remain consistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.