ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Scanning Electron Microscopy and Bone.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enamel Tubules and Spindles: Enter and Exit the Amelocyte.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Enamel and Bleaching or Breaching: Vickers Hardness and Backscattered Electron Imaging.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Research progress on mesenchymal stem cell‑derived exosomes in the treatment of osteoporosis induced by knee osteoarthritis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This chapter discusses methods for preparing samples of bone and bone cells for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging is by far the most useful in the bone field, followed by secondary electrons (SE) and the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analytical modes. Samples may have detail in a 3D surface, or be topography-free, polished or micromilled, resin-embedded block surfaces, or resin casts of space compartments surrounded by bone matrix. Shipping wet bone samples between labs is best done in glycerol. Methods for cells include fixation, drying, looking at undersides of bone cells, and metallic conductive coating. Maceration with alkaline bacterial pronase, hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium or potassium hydroxide to remove cells and unmineralized matrix is described in detail. Attention is given especially to methods for 3D BSE-SEM imaging of bone samples. PMMA is recommended for embedding because it is easily micromilled or polished. Iodine vapor staining of PMMA blocks gives excellent histology for cells and unmineralized matrix with BSE-SEM. Making spatial casts from PMMA or other resin embedded samples is an important use of this material. Correlation with other imaging means, including confocal scanning light microscopy, point projection X-ray microscopy, microradiography and microtomography, is important. Cathodoluminescence (CL) mode SEM imaging is an alternative for visualizing fluorescent mineralizing front labels such as calcein and tetracyclines. Laser ablation microtomy allows preparation of samples as slides for any method of light microscopy combined with SEM. Control of the vacuum pressure in the SEM sample chamber can be used to eliminate "charging" problems without the need to apply a surface conductive coating, making SEM quick and easy to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.