Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448749›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025

Determining the sequence of extracting Pinus radiata bark to maximize the total yield of extractives-towards the development of a bark-based biorefinery.

Sumanth Ranganathan, Sylke H Campion, Reid A Dale, Queenie L Tanjay, Rachel H Murray, Anna de Lena, Michael Robertson, Armin Thumm, Mark West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sumanth RanganathanScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand. sumanth.ranganathan@scionresearch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-1338
Sylke H CampionScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Reid A DaleScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Queenie L TanjayScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Rachel H MurrayScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Anna de LenaScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Michael RobertsonScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Armin ThummScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.
Mark WestScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010, New Zealand.

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C04×1802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pinus radiata is the dominant tree species in exotic plantation forestry of New Zealand producing timber for construction and pulp and paper. Additionally, the processing yields large amounts of bark as a byproduct that is either left at the harvest site or used for landscaping. P. radiata bark is rich in biochemical extractives containing polyphenols and waxes on sequential extraction with hydrophilic and lipophilic solvents, respectively. Previous studies have exclusively focussed on the effect of parameters such as solvent type, bark to solvent ratio, and extraction time on the yield of extractives. However, two parameters were always maintained constant: solvent order (lipophilic to hydrophobic) and particle size. This work investigated the the combined impact of these two parameters on total yield and product quality by using two solvents- water and hexane. Total extractives were highest when water was used first (11.74% and 9.45%) compared to hexane (10.53% and 6.53%). The individual yields of hexane extractives were in the range of 2.25-2.9% while those of water were 4.30-9.24%. Chemical analyses of the extracts and residues showed no qualitative differences, indicating the order in which bark is extracted does not alter the extract composition. Moreover, the results have successfully established that extracting bark with water first followed by hexane will increase the total yield of extractives and increasing particle size decreases the total yield of the sequential extraction.

Indexed as

Bark biorefineryCircular bioeconomyExtractivesHydrophilicLipophilicPinus radiataSequential extraction

Identifiers

PMID40448749
PMCPMC12126402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.