Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40448746›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Revolutionising cancer intervention: the repercussions of CAR-T cell therapy on modern oncology practices.

Hossam Kamli, Najeeb Ullah Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hossam KamliDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Najeeb Ullah KhanInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25130, Pakistan. najeebkhan@aup.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a groundbreaking advance in oncology, leveraging patient-specific immune cells to target malignant tumours precisely. By equipping T cells with synthetic receptors, CAR-T therapy achieves remarkable antitumor effects and offers hope for durable cancer control. However, several limitations persist, including antigen scarcity, immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments, and T-cell exhaustion. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has enhanced CAR-T potency by knocking out immune checkpoints (PD-1, CTLA-4) and improving persistence, while RNA interference (RNAi) silences immune-evasion genes (e.g. SOCS1). Nanozyme-based delivery systems enable precise CRISPR-Cas9 delivery (> 70% editing efficiency) and tumour targeting, overcoming instability and off-target effects. Innovations like SUPRA CARs, armoured CAR-T cells (e.g. IL-12/IL-21-secreting TRUCKs), and dual checkpoint inhibition synergize to reprogram the tumour microenvironment, reducing relapse by 40% in trials. Despite progress, high costs, manufacturing hurdles, and ethical concerns (e.g. germline editing risks) remain critical barriers. Emerging solutions include universal off-the-shelf CAR-Ts, hybrid nano-CRISPR systems, and AI-driven design, paving the way for scalable, personalised immunotherapy. This review highlights breakthroughs in CRISPR, RNAi, and nanotechnology, underscoring CAR-T therapy's transformative potential while addressing translational challenges for broader clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansMedical OncologyTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCancer immunotherapyCAR-T therapyCRISPR-Cas9 in oncologyGenetic engineeringNanozymes in cancerTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.