ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Revolutionising cancer intervention: the repercussions of CAR-T cell therapy on modern oncology practices.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Cold to Hot: Nanozyme-Based Strategies for Reprogramming the Tumour Immunoenvironment.Cell proliferation · 2026Review
- Smart control of CAR-T cells: emerging strategies for safer and more effective cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials in gene therapy and genome editing: challenges and emerging directions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Stem cell and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology in Alzheimer's disease therapy: from basic research to clinical innovation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in cancer immunotherapy: a frontier review on enhancing treatment efficacy and safety.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a groundbreaking advance in oncology, leveraging patient-specific immune cells to target malignant tumours precisely. By equipping T cells with synthetic receptors, CAR-T therapy achieves remarkable antitumor effects and offers hope for durable cancer control. However, several limitations persist, including antigen scarcity, immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments, and T-cell exhaustion. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has enhanced CAR-T potency by knocking out immune checkpoints (PD-1, CTLA-4) and improving persistence, while RNA interference (RNAi) silences immune-evasion genes (e.g. SOCS1). Nanozyme-based delivery systems enable precise CRISPR-Cas9 delivery (> 70% editing efficiency) and tumour targeting, overcoming instability and off-target effects. Innovations like SUPRA CARs, armoured CAR-T cells (e.g. IL-12/IL-21-secreting TRUCKs), and dual checkpoint inhibition synergize to reprogram the tumour microenvironment, reducing relapse by 40% in trials. Despite progress, high costs, manufacturing hurdles, and ethical concerns (e.g. germline editing risks) remain critical barriers. Emerging solutions include universal off-the-shelf CAR-Ts, hybrid nano-CRISPR systems, and AI-driven design, paving the way for scalable, personalised immunotherapy. This review highlights breakthroughs in CRISPR, RNAi, and nanotechnology, underscoring CAR-T therapy's transformative potential while addressing translational challenges for broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.