ArticleNeurogenetics2025
A case series of joubert syndrome evaluated with whole exome sequencing and the utility of optical genome mapping in the diagnosis.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoubert syndrome (JS) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease characterized by molar tooth sign, hypotonia during infancy, developmental delay, and/or intellectual disability. Over 40 genes have been associated with the syndrome, and population-specific founder variants have been defined.
methodsIn our study, we evaluated 34 patients with clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings. Whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis was performed on all patients to explain the underlying genetic causes. Optical genome mapping (OGM) was performed to elucidate the genetic mechanism in two patients with heterozygous variants after WES analysis.
resultsEighteen homozygous, three compound heterozygous, and two heterozygous variants were present in thirteen patients. AHI1, c.961dupG, p.Asp321fs*5; CPLANE1, c.569A > G, p.Glu190Gly; CPLANE1, c.7495dup, Ile2499Asnfs*2; CC2D2A, c.4143G > T, p.Lys1381Asn; KIAA0586, c.4889 T > C, p.Leu1630Pro; PIBF1, c.1231C > T, p.Arg411Ter; TMEM237, c.591delG, p.Thr198Profs*5; TMEM138, c.376G > C, p.Ala126Pro were novel variants. In addition, in the OGM analysis, a heterozygous insertion was detected in the 3'UTR region of RPGRIP1L. Patients with a diagnosis of JS that could not be explained by WES itself but could be explained together with OGM were discussed.
conclusionThis study contributes to the clinical and molecular characteristics of JS patients. Despite growing literature about JS, this is the first study to use OGM for the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.