ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Skin wetness perception across body sites in children and adolescents aged 7-16 years old.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The maturation of regional sweating patterns from childhood to young adulthood in females.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Skin wetness perception across body sites in children and adolescents aged 7-16 years old.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human skin wetness perception relies on the multisensory integration of thermal and mechanical cues during contact with moisture. Yet, it is unknown whether children and adolescents perceive skin wetness similarly to younger and older adults. We investigated skin wetness perceptions across the forehead, neck, forearm, and foot dorsum in 12 children/adolescents (4F/8M; 12 ± 3 years), 41 younger (21F/20M; 25 ± 3 years), and 21 older adults (11F/10M; 56 ± 6 years), during two established quantitative sensory tests. Our results indicated that, given the same moisture content (0.8 mL of water), very cold-wet stimuli applied to the forearm were perceived by all groups as wetter than neutral-wet (mean difference: 35.5 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale for wetness [95% CI: 22.3, 38.7]; P < 0.0001; ∼35% difference) and very hot-wet stimuli (mean difference: 22.7 mm [95% CI: 14.5, 40.9]; P < 0.0001; ∼23% difference). Children/adolescents also reported greater wetness perceptions than older adults during cold-wet stimulation of the forehead, neck and foot dorsum (mean difference: 20.6 mm; 95% CI: 1.5, 39.7; P = 0.031; ∼21% difference). In all age groups, the foot dorsum presented higher cold-wet sensitivity (mean difference: 11.1mm [95%CI 2.2, 20.0] p = 0.010; ~11% difference) and lower warm-wet sensitivity than the neck (mean difference: 12.9mm [95%CI 2.8, 23.0] p = 0.008; ~13% difference). We conclude that wetness perceptions in children/adolescents (age range: 7-16 years) are similar to those of adults in that both present (1) a characteristic U-shaped relationship between stimulus temperature and perceived wetness magnitude and (2) similar body regional patterns. These findings provide novel evidence on age-dependent variations in wetness perception which could inform user-centred innovation in thermal protection and garment design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.