SynthesisJournal of water and health2025
The use of faecal indicator organisms to manage microbial health risks in recreational waterways not impacted by point sources of sewage: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence.
Synthesis in Journal of water and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating environmental and health data: insights and lessons from Australia's water monitoring systems.Journal of water and health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This PRISMA review investigated the extent to which epidemiological evidence supports the use of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) to manage microbial health risks in recreational waters without point sources of sewage. The quality of papers meeting the inclusion criteria was appraised using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool and low-bias studies were synthesised. Studies consistently reported elevated illness risks (particularly gastrointestinal) among bathers compared with non-bathers. However, no FIOs or pathogens were associated consistently with any health outcomes. While enterococci most frequently correlated with a variety of illnesses, the relatively even split of positive and negative associations suggests an overall lack of association. Consequently, applying FIO guidelines derived from epidemiological studies with point sources of sewage could result in type I and type II errors. Overall, results suggest that the sources and drivers of health risks are site-specific. Tools including sanitary surveys, microbial source tracking, epidemiology and quantitative microbial risk assessment provide avenues for characterising site-specific health risks, for those who can afford them. Meanwhile, characterising the site-specific sources/drivers of contamination seems pragmatic as the limited evidence so far suggests that FIO monitoring may not be sufficient to protect health in these waters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40448461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.